Sentencing assaults

The Sentencing Council has published new guidelines for dealing with assault cases in Magistrates' Courts.  The new guidelines are much more comphrensive than the old ones.  Broadly speaking, offences are split into three levels indicating the seriousness of injuries suffered and the culpability of the offender.  The court must then consider any aggravating or mitigating factors before selecting an appropriate starting point for sentence.  The court then must go through various steps that increase or decrease the sentence before arriving at a decision.

Will this increase sentences?  Er... no.

Let us look at assault with intent to resist arrest.  Under the old guidelines there were three levels of seriousness and the starting points went:
  1. Low level community order;
  2. High level community order; and 
  3. Crown Court (which means that the case is too serious for the magistrates to sentence because the sentence exceeds their maximum 6-month imprisonment power).
The new guidelines for the same offence are:
  1. Band B fine;
  2. Mid level community order; and
  3. 26-weeks in prison.
The position with ABH is similar, although these offences are often heard in the Crown Court so these guidelines don't apply.  For ABH, the middle offence sees the starting point rise by 2-weeks in prison to 26-weeks custody while the least serious form of ABH drops from a high level community order to a medium level community order.

Assault on a police constable in the execution of his duty follows a similar drop; this is a summary only offence that can only be heard in the magistrates court.  The old guidelines gave the following starting points:
  1. Low level community order;
  2. High level community order; and
  3. 18-weeks in prison.
The new guidelines are:
  1. Band B fine;
  2. Medium level community order; and
  3. 12-weeks imprisonment.
It may not be entirely fair to compare these starting points side by side because the old guidelines took a slightly different approach to working out the starting point and the new guidelines are far more comphrensive than the old.

Here's a link to the new guidelines and here are the complete Magistrates' Court Sentencing Guidelines as used in courts every day, which is where I took the old starting points from in this post.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Are items referred to in s.9’s as exhibits bound to be served?

  Background - CPS served a witness statement on me that exhibited two BWV clips that are potentially relevant to the Crown’s case and may have some relevance to the defence case insofar as they are likely to show the lighting and weather at the time events happened. Somebody has listed the clips as unused material rather than putting them in the exhibits folder that accompanies the served evidence. This raised an interesting (to me anyway) question about whether a party who exhibits an item in a statement is bound to serve it on their opponent. At court the judge took the view that the Crown were at liberty to classify items exhibited in s9s as unused material if they chose not to rely upon them in evidence. I took the view that if they are exhibited then they must be served along with the witness statement that exhibits the item and that the solution to a situation where the Crown say they are now unused is to edit the witness statement to remove the reference, by agreement with the
More gibberish >>

Driving without insurance

Image
Insurance is a contract that remains in force until it expires or is cancelled As you may, or may not, know I specialise in motoring law and most of my work involves defending people accused of drink driving . With the drink driving often come other road traffic offences such as driving while disqualified and driving without insurance. It’s driving without insurance I want to talk about today because I think far too many police officers, solicitors, barristers and judges miss a key legal point when looking at these cases. I’ve received prosecution papers today for somebody accused of driving while disqualified and driving without insurance. The no insurance element is claim that the suspect did not tell the insurer about the disqualification. In his statement, the police officers says, “ [I] contacted [the insurer] who called me back informing me they would not consider the insurance policy valid as there were no convictions disclosed.” Looks like an open an
More gibberish >>

National Identity Cards

Image
A mock up of a British National Identity Card Following the Second World War, Britain called for help from the people of the Commonwealth to come and fill thousands of job vacancies. Many answered the call and came to be known as the Windrush Generation after named the MV Empire Windrush, which docked in Tilbury on the 22 nd June 1948 bringing the first workers from Jamaica, Trinidad and Tobago. The Home Office inevitably screwed up and caused a huge number of problems for members of the Windrush Generation. But their story is not the subject of this blog. Instead, I want to look at a side issue that has raised its weary head once again: ID cards. Alan Johnson and Charles Clarke, both former Home Secretaries, have begun a call for ID cards as the solution to the troubles of undocumented British citizens who have not had their status regularised. ID cards pop up every few years and I’ve no doubt that eventually we’ll have a compulsory piece of plastic foisted upon us that
More gibberish >>